Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

Important!

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 10:45 on 14 April 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 121.85.237.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Attempting to post in Japanese. Stopped by the edit filter. Not MAB. PhilKnight (talk) 10:33, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

• 2400:adcc:210a:5c00:e1ba:f2e6:af69:9834 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• 70.167.159.212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Ref desk troll again. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
• Dilekduru (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Block evasion, appears to be a sock of globally locked user YAZMAYANTÜKENMEZKALEM. Continuing to add the name "Abdullah Esenkal" to Jelena Čanković, something two confirmed socks (Kübra1907kübra and Gizemakman19) have previously done on the same article. [1] [2]. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 05:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
• 2601:18D:4A7F:1590:809F:7101:A496:2437 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Gust of Wind (diff): vandalism after final warning. Binksternet (talk) 05:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
• 2600:387:C:7131:0:0:0:6 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Another IP address used by User:Jinnifer for talk page harassment. NJZombie (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
• 2600:387:F:5C38:0:0:0:1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Another IP address used by User:Jinnifer for talk page harassment. NJZombie (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

  The couple of edits don't seem like harassment... ~Lofty abyss 09:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

  They are when you see that all four IPs in the conversation, two of which have already been blocked, are the same user. All edits by this LTA are reported here as vandalism. “Clerk note: All cases fitting the stereotypical Jinnifer modus operandi should be reported to AIV or any available admin, rather than here. Requests for global blocks/locks can be made at m:SRG in lieu of or in addition to such requests for local action.” See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnifer. Attempting to get established users to make changes for them or agree the change they want is valid. This has been the user’s modus operandi for over two years now. NJZombie (talk) 09:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)